You: a schoola coaching centrea collegea learnerChange

Book a demo

Learners master skills · AI questions and review

Practice and tests that match what your teachers actually taught.

Drafted from your own notes, and approved by your teachers and vetted experts before any student sees it.

Names and figures on this page are illustrative.

Sample: the question below was drafted from one physics chapter’s own material, its notes, textbook chapter, a photo of a circuit diagram and last year’s chapter test, private to the institution.

Review panel · AI draft

Physics · Ch 6 · Faraday’s law

A 200-turn coil’s magnetic flux rises from 0.02 Wb to 0.06 Wb in 0.1 s. What emf is induced?

  1. Draft
  2. In review
  3. Live
  • Lakshmi K.Your physics teacher
  • Vetted expertPhysics, 12 years teaching
  • Vetted expertPhysics, board examiner

    “Asks for a clearer unit in the answer options”

Status: Live · 2 of 3 approved, two-thirds needed

The difference

A question from anywhere, or one from your chapter

A generic AI question

Which of the following best describes electromagnetic induction?

  • Not from your notes
  • Recall only
  • Unreviewed
Drafted from your material, then approved

A 200-turn coil’s magnetic flux rises from 0.02 Wb to 0.06 Wb in 0.1 s. What emf is induced?

  • From your Chapter 6 notes
  • SI units
  • PU board style
  • Applies a concept
  • Approved by your panel

How a question is made

Nothing reaches a student unchecked

  1. 01

    Your material

    Notes, textbook chapters, past papers and diagrams, attached to each chapter. Private to your institution: never shared with, or adopted by, another.

  2. 02

    An AI draft

    Drafted from that material in your style: guidance you write once at institution, syllabus, course or chapter level carries into every test below it.

  3. 03

    Your panel approves

    An automatic check first, then a vote by your teachers and experts vetted by TestMySkills. No setting skips review.

  4. 04

    Live

    Only then does a student see it. A random sample of live questions is re-checked later, and a wrong one goes back to review.

Sample: one physics chapter’s material, private to the institution: notes and a textbook chapter whose text is indexed, a photo of a circuit diagram described in words, and last year’s chapter test. A 20-question test drafted from it sent 18 questions to review and held 2 back.
Chapter material · pick one to see what was read

The 18 that pass the check go to the panel, like the question at the top of this page. Approved questions also feed each student’s adaptive practice →

FAQ

Questions teachers ask about AI questions

Will AI-written questions ever be wrong?

They can be, which is why none reaches a student directly. Each is checked automatically first, then approved by a review panel. Even after a question goes live, a random sample of approved questions is re-checked, and a wrong one goes back to review.

Can an AI-written question reach a student without anyone checking it?

No. Every AI draft is checked automatically and then needs a review panel’s approval. There is no setting that skips review for AI-drafted questions.

Who can see the notes and papers we upload?

Only your institution. Uploaded material is private to you and is never shared with or adopted by any other institution.

Will the questions sound like our syllabus, or like generic AI?

You write standing guidance once, at institution, syllabus, course or chapter level: who your students are, the vocabulary to use, the style to follow. Every test generated below that level inherits it.

Who reviews our questions?

People assigned to review that subject: your own teachers, and subject experts vetted by TestMySkills. Your institution decides who reviews its content.

What if we don’t have enough reviewers yet?

A question that can’t reach a decision goes to a TestMySkills administrator, whose decision is recorded. This is normal while a new institution builds its panel.

Does it work for JEE, NEET and other entrance exams?

Not yet. AI drafting works in academic courses today. For competitive exam tests, questions are picked from the reviewed questions already in the bank.

Full specification: what you control, and the rules the panel works by
What you can upload
PDF, Word and text documents, images, audio, video, YouTube links, or pasted text.
Privacy
Uploaded material belongs to your institution only. It is never shared with, or adopted by, another institution.
Guidance
Written once at institution, syllabus, course or chapter level and reviewed before use; add notes for a single test on top.
Difficulty
Set the mix of easy, medium and hard questions per test.
Thinking levels
Target levels from Bloom’s taxonomy, Webb’s Depth of Knowledge, SOLO or Dreyfus, alone or in combination.
Multiple choice
Choose three, four or five options per question, test by test.
Equations
A visual equation editor for maths, physics and chemistry when writing or editing questions. No LaTeX needed.
Where it works today
AI drafting works in academic courses. Competitive exam, certification and skills tests are assembled from reviewed questions already in the bank.
Stages
Drafted → checked → in review → live, or sent back with a note and returned for rework. Retired questions stay on record.
Staff-written questions
Can go through the same review. A TestMySkills administrator can also publish one directly, and that choice is recorded. AI drafts can never skip review.
Panel
By default three reviewers vote and two-thirds must approve. Your institution can change both numbers.
Who can review
Only people assigned to review that subject. A general expert profile doesn’t grant access to your private content.
Deadlocks
Too few eligible reviewers, or a tie, goes to a TestMySkills administrator, and their decision is recorded.
Trust levels
Reviewers move from New to Standard, Trusted and Expert as their record grows: after 10, 50 and 200 reviews, with enough agreement from their panels.
Independent votes count more
A vote cast while the panel is still split counts for more than one that joins an agreement already formed.
Unusual activity
A sudden burst of reviews from one person is flagged for someone to look at. It never blocks the reviewer on its own.
Audits
A random sample of approved decisions is re-checked, whatever the reviewer’s level.
A wrong live question
Goes back into review for a fresh decision rather than being deleted. The finding is noted on the original review for a person to weigh, never used to penalise a reviewer automatically.
Sharing
Publish your own courses and questions for other institutions to adopt, or adopt theirs. Everything stays private until you choose. You see how many institutions adopted yours; completion and pass rates appear only once at least three others teach it.

Teach or examine a subject? Become a reviewer →

Send us one chapter.

After your first unit test, you’ll see your own sections side by side and each student’s weakest topics.

Book a demo
Book a demo